The IMF Fiscal Monitor provides the usual insightful global summary of public finance trends. It reveals significant progress in the reduction of structural deficits in the developed world, at the price of drastic fiscal tightening that will aggravate further this year. However, public debt ratios have yet to peak and their current levels bode ill for future growth and government shock-absorption capabilities. A major implicit concern is Japan, where the structural deficit has not been reduced and both net and gross debt have been soaring.
The impact of non-conventional monetary policy on financial markets
The April 2013 IMF Global Financial Stability Report takes stock of the market impact of non-conventional central bank policies. In particular, the latter have replaced traditional interbank and money market activity, turned the Fed into a dominant player in the U.S. MBS market, and made all G4 centrals banks (and particularly the Bank of England) a major holder of local government debt. The politically mandated biases in market prices could unwind disorderly if and when economic development mandates a reversal of non-conventional policies.
Europe’s financial transaction tax and the consequences
A recent HSBC report argues that the planned financial transaction tax in the Eurozone will have a profound negative impact on investment returns, as well as on liquidity in cash products and derivatives. The tax is expected to be introduced next year and have broad implication well beyond the countries that have agreed to it.
Japan’s “Quantitative and Qualitative Easing”
On April 4 Bank of Japan Governor Haruhiko Kuroda unveiled aggressive “Quantitative and Qualitative Monetary Easing” (QQE), in order to meet a 2% inflation target within two years after 15 years of deflation. QQE means a shift of the operating targeting of the central bank to the monetary base, massive planned bond and other asset purchases, and a significant extension of duration in bond purchases. Market commentators almost uniformly concluded that QQE marks an extraordinary policy shift with historical dimensions and significant implication for global asset prices.
Why and when “equity duration” matters
A new HSBC report suggests that if and when Quantitative Easing is being reversed it could be a watershed event for sectoral equity performance. Their view is based on the concept of “equity duration”. The long-standing outperformance of low-beta and high-quality stocks, which have longest duration and benefited most from three decades of falling yields, should come to an end and be replaced by relative strength of cyclical, financial and materials stocks.
The FX carry-equity nexus
Galsband and Nitschka claim that the outperformance of high-carry currency trades over the past 30 years reflects a premium for correlation with shocks to equity cash flows. While the finding may sound trivial, its implications are important. In particular, in connection with the negative impact of currency strength on local equity, the fx carry-equity nexus would imply that carry countries’ local-currency equity returns should outperform in crisis times, as they are buffered by the exchange rate and become a better diversifier, when all other correlation increase.
The unpleasant dynamics of fiscal tightening
A new IMF paper argues that the short-term negative feedback of fiscal consolidation on economic growth is particularly strong at present, because of lending constraints, limits to monetary easing, and the global scope of restriction. As a result, fiscal tightening in today’s developed countries may, by itself, initially raise debt ratios over and above their trajectory without fiscal action. While the effect may not be lasting, it can lead to dangerous dynamics if financial markets fixate on debt dynamics and governments engage in multiple rounds of tightening.
Asset overvaluation and bubbles
Ever wondered why an asset or asset class maintains an implausibly high price? A new IMF paper summarizes research on “bubbles”, the phenomenon of a lasting overvaluation. It suggests, for example, that the focus on relative performance among asset managers and the presumption of informed decisions by peers causes herding. Also, limited liability of managers and leveraged institutions encourages upside risk taking. Meanwhile, sell-side research, rating agencies, and accountants often lack the incentives to pre-emptively reveal downside risks. Political and institutional aversion to short selling aggravates overvaluation bias.
A Fed view on low long-term yields
Federal Reserve Chairman Bernanke recently explained globally low long-term yields as a combination of anchored inflation expectations, negative real policy rates, and a compressed term premium. The latter is seen as the key development since 2010 resulting from (i) the surge in private demand in the wake of reduced nominal volatility and negative correlation with risk markets and (ii) a surge in public demand resulting from asset purchase programs and FX reserves replenishing. Bernanke emphasizes that the Fed, markets, and forecasters all expect long-term yields to drift higher by 50-75bps per year through 2017. Yet, actually his reasoning would make a sustained directional change in yields contingent on fading crisis and deflation fears.
Large currency moves and equity performance
Citi equity research investigates the relation between currencies and equity markets. It suggests that typically large currency appreciation (depreciation) coincides with underperformance (outperformance) of the equity market in local currency terms. However, the currency moves tend to be larger than the equity moves. This supports the case for hedging local-currency equity exposure against currency strength and USD-based equity exposure against currency weakness. Hedge ratios should be diverse across countries, as correlation with currency weakness is a function of industry structure. Emerging market equities have historically not always correlated negatively with currencies due to the prevalence of crisis events.
